A tiny prologue

When the time comes for me to analyze my artistic practice, I prefer to take a detour first. I would rather talk about myself since it is me that is the mastermind and executioner of my practice. When it comes down to art or life even, I always appreciate and enjoy a nice joke. A joke that sometimes can be considered morbid, of poor taste or of terribly wrong timing. I understand and appreciate sarcasm, especially when one is being sarcastic about oneself. I feel like humor can be a corrosive substance; it has the extraordinary power of catharsis, the psychological mechanism that releases all the steam built up inside.

Humour is playful, wild and liberating. It can also become a vehicle for articulating ideas that might be too painful or serious to handle. When it comes to seriousness, I always think of a supernova when its gravity becomes so intense that it collapses within itself. Humor can challenge authority - a direct act of disobedience against hierarchy, power, and sanctity whether it is social, metaphysical, political or even personal, emotional.

Humour in my work it is more of a hint, subtle and implied, lurking like the rake waiting for a face to slam but never exhibiting the actual slapstick comic incident and the cheap relief it would bring. A conscious decision to elegantly mock, deface the Grand scheme of things, flip the middle finger to it- an existential gesture.

My artistic practice, identity and development

During my career, professional and academic,  I strived to become an artist who can adapt in different situations, respond appropriately to different ideas and take advantage of the possibilities of different media and what they offer.  So, I can safely claim that I am multidisciplinary artist, from drawing to performance, video or self-publication or painting; I regard each medium as a different language, an artform of its own in a sense; an opportunity to push my boundaries and to explore the possibilities both within my work but in terms of communicating with the viewer as well. I define myself as a conceptual artist, an artist who relies on ideas. I do feel that I have plenty. Humor is the glue, the invisible web that intertwines all of my projects. My decision is not to talk about these matters in a serious manner but in a seemingly light and easy one even self-deprecating.

Using this approach is like deconstructing a situation and then reassemble in according to one specific needs. Knockdown something conceptually and then reusing the debris to create something that might simultaneously resemble the original but the context is now too different.

Benjamin in his essay The Destructive character writes:

The destructive character sees nothing permanent. But for this very rea­ son, he sees ways everywhere. Where others encounter walls or moun­ tains, there, too, he sees a way. But because he sees a way everywhere, he has to clear things from it everywhere. Not always by brute force; sometimes by the most refined. Because he sees ways everywhere, he always stands at a crossroads. No moment can know what the next will bring. What exists he reduces to rubble - not for     the sake of rubble, but for that of the way leading through it. (1931)

But what is my identity? I am a destructive character but in a creative way. A person who destroys just to reconstruct and propose something else. I identify myself as an artist who responds to everyday stimuli - Ideas just pop up, and if they stand the test of time (I take my time and evaluate before I act), I try to find ways to create them, to choose the right medium, the correct - according to me- way of representing them. I see ways everywhere, and I force myself to step out of my safe zone, pushing myself to different directions, exploring media and exploring my inner self, expanding possibilities and manipulating visual languages. Standing at a crossroad and taking decisions that sometimes surprise me, I reduce to rubble only to build my idiom, taking chances, acting like a curious kid, that wonders, what would happen if?

Lastly, it feels like I have come a long way, from critical, distant and a non-self-involving stance to the main concept, to an intimate and self­ reflecting way of working that, feels close to the heart and to my idiosyncrasies. A way of working that leaves me exposed because I am more daring to reveal myself and my secrets to the world even if sometimes I choose to hide, which is paradoxical. I expose my own personal way of seeing, what I like to describe as an optimistic negativism, a constructive iconoclasm (self-iconoclasm included) and the more I immerge into my practice, the more satisfaction I gain. Experimenting, creating new compositions, combining elements that are out of place, playing with ideas and with the audience, posing questions this is the essence of my practice and I wish I will have the opportunity to take it another step down the road, making my work relevant to the world, historically and socially, and yet keeping it personal. A way to be an introverted extrovert.




Works cited
Benjamin, Walter. "The Destructive Character." Frankfurter Zeitung 20 Nov. 1931: n. pag. Web.
Marker